Abstract
This paper presents a social study on the maritime port of Montreal investigating the spread of social inclusion in the maritime industry. We used both qualitative and quantitative methods, including structural equation modeling to answer the research questions. Our ?ndings show that the spread of social inclusion was significant in the port in terms of workplace diversity and inclusion, the workplace environment, and the port’s responsibility toward society. These findings highlight specific factors that are currently being overlooked and thus require greater industry collaboration. The proposed framework also serves as a tool for a single maritime port to self-assess its current stage of sustainable development, with implications for future social-inclusion implementation strategies.
References
Alaghbari, L. M. A., Othman, A. H. A., & Noor, A. B. M. (2021). Challenges and difficulties facing Islamic financial inclusion in women's economic empowerment in Yemen: Qualitative approach. International Journal of Business Ethics and Governance, 4(3), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.51325/ijbeg.v4i3.80
Alamoush, A. S., Ballini, F., & Ölçer, A. I. (2021). Revisiting port sustainability as a foundation for the implementation of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs). Journal of Shipping and Trade, 6(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-021-00101-6
Benamara, H., Hoffmann, J., & Youssef, F. (2019). Maritime transport: The sustainability imperative. In Sustainable Shipping (pp. 1–31). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04330-8_1
Evangelista, P. (2014). Environmental sustainability practices in the transport and logistics service industry: An exploratory case study investigation. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 12, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.10.002
Froholdt, L. L. (Ed.). (2018). Corporate social responsibility in the maritime industry (Vol. 5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69143-5_2
Gupta, I., Mishra, N., & Tandon, D. (2020). Triple bottom line: Evidence from aviation sector. International Journal of Business Ethics and Governance, 3(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.51325/ijbeg.v3i1.32
Hunt, V., Prince, S., Dixon-Fyle, S., & Yee, L. (2018). Delivering through diversity. McKinsey & Company.
International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2021). A concept of a sustainable maritime transportation system, sustainable development: IMO’s contribution beyond RIO+20.
Kunnaala, V. H., Lappalainen, J., & Storgärd, J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the Baltic Sea maritime sector. In IMISS2013—Proceedings of the international scientific meeting for corporate social responsibility (CSR) in shipping, 2nd international maritime incident and near-miss reporting conference (pp. 11–12). Kotka, Finland.
Lund-Thomsen, P., Poulsen, R. T., & Ackrill, R. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in the international shipping industry: State-of-the-art, current challenges, and future directions. The Journal of Sustainable Mobility, 3(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.2350.2016.de.00002
McHugh, M. L. (2013). The chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica, 23(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.11613/issn.1846-7482
Moir, L. (2021). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1(2), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005486
Ntona, M., & Morgera, E. (2018). Connecting SDG 14 with the other Sustainable Development Goals through marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 93, 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.06.020
Pedersen, C. S. (2018). The UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) are a great gift to business! Procedia CIRP, 69, 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.01.003
Port of Montreal. (2022). Statistiques. https://www.port-montreal.com/fr/le-port-de-montreal/le-port/en-bref/statistiques
Poulovassilis, A., & Meidanis, S. (2013). Sustainability of shipping—Addressing corporate social responsibility through management systems. Saatavilla. http://www.commonlawgic.org/sustainabilityof-shipping.html
Progoulaki, M., & Roe, M. (2011). Dealing with multicultural human resources in a socially responsible manner: A focus on the maritime industry. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 10(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-011-0003-0
Qingmei, L., & Hong, Z. (2021). The effect of maritime cluster on port production efficiency. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1754479
Roe, M. (2013). Maritime governance and corporate social responsibility in shipping: Process rather than form. In IMISS2013—Proceedings of the international scientific meeting for corporate social responsibility (CSR) in shipping, 2nd international maritime incident and near-miss reporting conference (pp. 11–12). Kotka, Finland.
Saunders, F. P., Gilek, M., & Tafon, R. (2019). Adding people to the sea: Conceptualizing social sustainability in maritime spatial planning. In Maritime spatial planning (pp. 175–199). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98696-8_8
Sciberras, L., & Silva, J. R. (2018). The UN’s 2030 agenda for sustainable development and the maritime transport domain: The role and challenges of IMO and its stakeholders through a grounded theory perspective. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 17(3), 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0147-2
Sislian, L., Jaegler, A., & Cariou, P. (2016). A literature review on port sustainability and ocean’s carrier network problem. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 19, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.03.005
Soiferman, L. K. (2010). Compare and contrast inductive and deductive research approaches. Online Submission.
Tenenhaus, M., Silvano, A., & Esposito, V. (2004). A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modeling. In Proceedings of the XLII SIS scientific meeting (pp. 739–742).
Timane, R. (2012). Business advantages of corporate social responsibility: Cases from India. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2180500
Virto, L. R. (2018). A preliminary assessment of the indicators for Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14 “Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development.” Marine Policy, 98, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.08.036

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Array